Corrections Policy
Learn how NerdsMagazine reviews reported errors, issues corrections or clarifications, and updates technology articles when facts or products change.
Updated
NerdsMagazine corrects verified material factual errors and updates technology content when relevant circumstances change. This policy explains how correction reports are evaluated and how we distinguish factual errors from clarifications, later updates, and reasonable differences of editorial judgment.
How to Report an Error
If you believe a NerdsMagazine article contains a factual error, outdated technical detail, incorrect specification, misleading source reference, or other substantive problem, send a correction report to corrections@nerdsmagazine.com.
Please include the article URL, the specific statement or section, a description of the suspected error, reliable supporting evidence where available, and contact details if follow-up may be useful.
How We Review a Report
- Identify the issue. We review the wording, image, table, specification, instruction, quotation, or other material identified in the report.
- Return to the evidence. The editorial team may review the sources originally used for the article.
- Check current authoritative information. Depending on the subject, this may include technical documentation, specifications, software behavior, research, public records, company statements, or additional evidence.
- Determine whether the problem existed at publication or arose later. This helps distinguish a correction from an update.
- Choose the appropriate outcome. The result may be a correction, clarification, update, or no change depending on what the evidence supports.
Possible Outcomes
- Correction
- A material factual error is confirmed in the published article.
- Clarification
- The original wording is not necessarily factually wrong, but additional wording or context is needed to prevent a misleading interpretation.
- Update
- The information was accurate when published but circumstances later changed, or important new information became available.
- No Change
- The available evidence supports the published information or the issue concerns a reasonable difference of editorial judgment rather than a factual error.
Examples of Corrections
- an incorrect product specification;
- a wrong name or date;
- a misattributed quote;
- an incorrect software requirement;
- a mathematical or scoring error;
- a materially inaccurate description of a feature;
- incorrect comparison data;
- a troubleshooting instruction based on an incorrect technical assumption.
Examples of Updates
- software changes after publication;
- an interface is redesigned;
- a product is discontinued;
- pricing changes;
- subscription plans are restructured;
- new security information becomes available;
- a new product version is released;
- compatibility changes;
- a company changes a previously announced plan.
An update does not necessarily mean the original article was wrong.
Minor Edits
Minor spelling, grammar, punctuation, formatting, broken-link, or readability changes may be made without a separate correction note when they do not materially alter meaning.
Technology Guides and Troubleshooting
Technical articles often become outdated because software, hardware, operating systems, interfaces, or services change. If an instruction was wrong when published, a correction may be appropriate. If it was originally correct but later stopped working, an update is generally more appropriate.
Reviews, Rankings and Comparisons
Factual errors in reviews, rankings, and comparisons are reviewed under the same correction standards as other NerdsMagazine content. A disagreement with an editorial recommendation does not by itself establish a factual error.
Paid visibility does not determine editorial ranking position.
Companies, Advertisers and PR Representatives
Companies, developers, manufacturers, PR representatives, advertisers, and other interested parties may submit correction requests. Commercial status does not determine the outcome. The relevant question is whether the published information is factually inaccurate, materially misleading, or no longer current.
Editorial Independence
Correction decisions are editorial decisions. Advertising, sponsorship, product access, partnerships, or other commercial relationships do not provide the right to suppress corrections, rewrite independent conclusions, or remove accurate criticism.
What to Expect
NerdsMagazine reviews serious correction reports but may not be able to respond individually to every message. Submitting a correction request does not guarantee that an article will be changed.
Contact
Corrections: corrections@nerdsmagazine.com
Editorial: editorial@nerdsmagazine.com
General: info@nerdsmagazine.com
See also Fact-Checking Policy, Editorial Policy, and Feedback.